In reality Rasputin never completely healed the Tsarevich. He brought relief for extended times, but not total healing. Thus, he didn't heal the Tsarevich. It is an interesting anomaly that he maintained an ability to bring relief but at the same time keep the family dependent on himself. This seems out of place in the greater revelation and lives of the saints. The saints healed freely while not cultivating dependency on their person. Rasputin is a divisive character, even during his time there were numerous holy people, even New Martyrs, who didn't trust him.
Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians details that some people may be given “gifts of healing” (in plural). That is to say, not all gifts of healing are the same, nor do they manifest equally in all people. It is true that Alexei was never truly healed of his hemophilia, but perhaps it was God’s providence to allow Alexei to survive in order to accompany his family to their martyrdom, faithfully bearing the cross of his disease. Indeed, it is undeniable that without Rasputin, Alexei would have died way before 1918. It is also important to note that Rasputin did heal many people completely, such as Anna Vyrubova, who almost died in a train accident in 1915. While the doctors believed she “was a hopeless case, Rasputin said “She will live” and so she did. He also healed Olga Lokhtina, as we already mentioned, as well as Lili Dehn’s son of a high fever. As for your comment about the Saints who disliked Rasputin, I suggest you read all of our articles where basically every single one of them has been addressed.
Calling Rasputin a "Jew Lover" was an early slander against him, just because he ministered in prison where there were revolutionary Jews. Nevertheless, it was those who conspired and murdered him who proved to be the 'tools'
In reality Rasputin never completely healed the Tsarevich. He brought relief for extended times, but not total healing. Thus, he didn't heal the Tsarevich. It is an interesting anomaly that he maintained an ability to bring relief but at the same time keep the family dependent on himself. This seems out of place in the greater revelation and lives of the saints. The saints healed freely while not cultivating dependency on their person. Rasputin is a divisive character, even during his time there were numerous holy people, even New Martyrs, who didn't trust him.
Paul’s First Epistle to the Corinthians details that some people may be given “gifts of healing” (in plural). That is to say, not all gifts of healing are the same, nor do they manifest equally in all people. It is true that Alexei was never truly healed of his hemophilia, but perhaps it was God’s providence to allow Alexei to survive in order to accompany his family to their martyrdom, faithfully bearing the cross of his disease. Indeed, it is undeniable that without Rasputin, Alexei would have died way before 1918. It is also important to note that Rasputin did heal many people completely, such as Anna Vyrubova, who almost died in a train accident in 1915. While the doctors believed she “was a hopeless case, Rasputin said “She will live” and so she did. He also healed Olga Lokhtina, as we already mentioned, as well as Lili Dehn’s son of a high fever. As for your comment about the Saints who disliked Rasputin, I suggest you read all of our articles where basically every single one of them has been addressed.
No it's because he was a paid Jewish asset, one which they eventually burned
wow you really love The Jews and their tool, Rasputin, don’t you
Calling Rasputin a "Jew Lover" was an early slander against him, just because he ministered in prison where there were revolutionary Jews. Nevertheless, it was those who conspired and murdered him who proved to be the 'tools'